<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taking The Blogosphere Seriously</title>
	<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Brodeur Journalists Survey Identifies Blogs’ Influence on Traditional News Coverage</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2008/01/08/brodeur-journalists-survey-identifies-blogs%e2%80%99-influence-on-traditional-news-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2008/01/08/brodeur-journalists-survey-identifies-blogs%e2%80%99-influence-on-traditional-news-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[RESULTS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reporters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2008/01/08/brodeur-journalists-survey-identifies-blogs%e2%80%99-influence-on-traditional-news-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogs help journalists set the tone with story ideas, angles and insights.
A survey of U.S. journalists by Brodeur, a unit of Omnicom Group (NYSE: OMC), suggests that blogs are not only having an impact on the speed and availability of news, but also influence the tone and editorial direction of reporting.
The survey is part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial"><strong>Blogs help journalists set the tone with story ideas, angles and insights.</strong><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">A survey of U.S. journalists by <a href="http://brodeur.com" target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outbound/article/brodeur.com');">Brodeur</a>, <span style="color: black">a unit of <a href="http://omnicomgroup.com" target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outbound/article/omnicomgroup.com');">Omnicom Group (NYSE: OMC)</a>, suggests that blogs are not only having an impact on the speed and availability of news, but also influence the tone and editorial direction of reporting.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The survey is part of an ongoing research project by Brodeur in conjunction with <a href="http://marketwire.com" target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outbound/article/marketwire.com');">Marketwire</a> to dissect and understand the impact that social media and blogs are having on traditional news delivery. <span> </span>The online survey was conducted among a random sample of North American reporters and editors, and was focused on understanding how social media and blogs influence their work.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><st1:personname w:st="on"><span style="font-family: Arial">Jerry  Johnson</span></st1:personname><span style="font-family: Arial">, head of strategic planning at Brodeur, shared the results during the “Taking the Blogosphere Seriously” seminar at the <a href="http://cesweb.org" target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outbound/article/cesweb.org');">Consumer Electronics Show</a> in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Las Vegas</st1:city></st1:place>. Johnson’s study uncovered a very balanced view of the blogosphere by reporters.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">“While only a small percentage of journalists feel that blogs are helpful in generating sources or exclusives, they do see blogs as particularly useful in helping them better understand the context of a story, a new story angle, or a new story idea.<span>  </span>It appears that reporters are using blogs more for ethnographic research than they are for investigative research,” Johnson commented.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Johnson went on to explain that the survey confirmed something many have suspected – that new media (social media and blogs) is having an impact on many different aspects of reporting, particularly the speed and availability of news.<span>  </span>Less than half of journalists thought that new media was having an impact – either good or bad – on the quality of news reporting.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The survey also uncovered several additional attitudes and behaviors:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial">Blogs are a regular source for journalists.</span></em></strong><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>  </span><span>Over three quarters of reporters see blogs as helpful in giving them story ideas, story angles and insight into the tone of an issue. </span><span> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in"><span style="font-family: Arial">Nearly 70% of all reporters check a blog list on a regular basis. <span>Over one in five (20.9%) reporters said they spend over an hour per day reading blogs.<span>  </span>And a total of nearly three in five (57.1%) reporters said they read blogs at least two to three times a week.<span>  </span><o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial">Journalists are increasingly active participants in the blogosphere.<span>  </span></span></em></strong><span style="font-family: Arial">One in four reporters (27.7%) have their own blogs and nearly one in five (16.3%) have their own social networking page. About half of reporters (47.5%) say they are “lurkers” – reading blogs but rarely commenting. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial">The <span>majority of journalists thought blogs were having a significant impact on news reporting in all areas tested EXCEPT in the area of news quality. </span></span></em></strong><span style="font-family: Arial"><span> </span>The biggest impact has been in speed and availability of news.<span>  </span>Over half said that blogs were having a significant impact on the “tone” (61.8%) and “editorial direction” (51.1%) of news reporting.</span><span style="font-family: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">“Like any new social phenomenon, the blogosphere has become a resource for reporters,” said Johnson, “but reporters are still creating their stories by going out and developing their own ideas and talking to their sources.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">“The blogosphere’s tail is not wagging the media body – at least not yet,” he said.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/brodeur-new-media-journalist-survey-summary-4-jan.pdf" title="Click here for a summary of the survey findings." onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/downloads/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/brodeur-new-media-journalist-survey-summary-4-jan.pdf');">Click here for a summary of the survey findings.</a><span style="font-family: Arial"> A full copy of the survey findings is available by emailing <st1:personname w:st="on">Jerry Johnson</st1:personname> at <a href="mailto:jjohnson@brodeur.com">jjohnson@brodeur.com</a>.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2008/01/08/brodeur-journalists-survey-identifies-blogs%e2%80%99-influence-on-traditional-news-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparency:  You can explain, but you can’t hide.</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-explain-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-hide/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-explain-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[open]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[records]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the most serious consequences of the rise of the blogosphere.  Back in the days of fax machines and MSDOS, it was much easier to hide.  While we used to tell clients to “not do it if you are not comfortable reading about it on the front page of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Arial">This is one of the most serious consequences of the rise of the blogosphere.  Back in the days of fax machines and MSDOS, it was much easier to hide.  While we used to tell clients to “not do it if you are not comfortable reading about it on the front page of the NYTimes”   we knew that there were sixty ways to kill a story.  You have to take the blogosphere seriously because now everyone &#8212; and I mean everyone &#8212; can have their 60 Minutes moment. A sea of folks out there now who are blogging, videotaping, audio recording, and documenting the most minute, discreet, and formerly hush-hush elements of every company, organization, and – in some cases </font></font><font size="2"><font face="Arial">–</font></font><font size="2"><font face="Arial"> individuals.  So take the transparency thing seriously &#8230; because you may just see what you’re doing in some person&#8217;s ‘mash-up’ …</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-explain-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engagement:  or honey, they shrunk the controls</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/forget-about-control/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/forget-about-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Closely tied to the issue of transparency is engagement.  Controlled media is out.  Conversational media is in.  It is not about getting your message &#8220;out&#8221; to a targeted audience.  It is about getting your message &#8220;in&#8221; to a meaningful conversation.  Yes I know that you yearn for the good old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Arial">Closely tied to the issue of transparency is engagement.  Controlled media is out.  Conversational media is in.  It is not about getting your message &#8220;out&#8221; to a targeted audience.  It is about getting your message &#8220;in&#8221; to a meaningful conversation.  Yes I know that you yearn for the good old days when you could just figure out what you wanted folks to hear and then blast the hell out of ‘em through every communication channel you can beg, borrow and steal.  Those days are gone.   People now choose their media, choose their message, choose their engagement.  And when you have a company like P&amp;G saying it – a company that wrote the book on obsessive-compulsive, hyper-controlling brand dictatorship – well then it must be true.</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/forget-about-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Community:  The flat, long-tails</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/there%e2%80%99s-literally-gold-in-the-hills-and-valleys-of-the-blogosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/there%e2%80%99s-literally-gold-in-the-hills-and-valleys-of-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chris anderson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[howard dean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legitimate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is real serious.  The ability to develop, tap, and nurture nodes of conversations that cut across geographies is changing the structure and process by which conversations are initiated and managed.  It is also changing business models and conventional thinking on how to separate people from their money.  Ron Paul and Howard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Arial">This is real serious.  The ability to develop, tap, and nurture nodes of conversations that cut across geographies is changing the structure and process by which conversations are initiated and managed.  It is also changing business models and conventional thinking on how to separate people from their money.  Ron Paul and Howard Dean.  Need I say anymore?  I mean, really.  If the blogosphere can generate millions for these guys then what do you think the potential is for legitimate products and reasonable causes?  Haven’t you read Chris Anderson’s book about the long tail?  You mean you didn’t invest in Google?  Amazon?  Netflix?  Shame on you.</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/there%e2%80%99s-literally-gold-in-the-hills-and-valleys-of-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buzz:  It now happens in an insanely short period of time.</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-get-a-lot-of-%e2%80%9cbuzz%e2%80%9d-generation-%e2%80%93-both-good-and-bad-%e2%80%93-in-an-insanely-short-time/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-get-a-lot-of-%e2%80%9cbuzz%e2%80%9d-generation-%e2%80%93-both-good-and-bad-%e2%80%93-in-an-insanely-short-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fury]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogs accelerate buzz.  It&#8217;s official.  Word of mouth is on steroids.  The steroid is not HGH.  The steroid is the blog.  The blogosphere’s got a herd mentality going on like nobody’s business.  The ups and downs of Wall Street have nothing on the gyrations of what is going on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Arial">Blogs accelerate buzz.  It&#8217;s official.  Word of mouth is on steroids.  The steroid is not HGH.  The steroid is the blog.  The blogosphere’s got a herd mentality going on like nobody’s business.  The ups and downs of Wall Street have nothing on the gyrations of what is going on in the cross-referenced, tagged, search-optimized world of blogs.  It’s not that everybody’s doing it.  It’s that enough of the smart, connected folks are doing it – and doing it in a very fun, engaging and entertaining way – that you can quickly get a lot of people interested in what you have to sell or what you have to say.  Oh, and it works the other way around too.  Hell hath no fury like the blogosphere scorned.  Ask the folks at Dell.</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/you-can-get-a-lot-of-%e2%80%9cbuzz%e2%80%9d-generation-%e2%80%93-both-good-and-bad-%e2%80%93-in-an-insanely-short-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do you think?</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/what-do-you-think-2/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/what-do-you-think-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What other claims or aspects of the blogosphere should we be TAKING seriously? Have I missed something?  Post what you think, have a discussion, and we&#8217;ll continually tally and assess the open forum.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What other claims or aspects of the blogosphere should we be TAKING seriously? Have I missed something?  Post what you think, have a discussion, and we&#8217;ll continually tally and assess the open forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/what-do-you-think-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratization:  You can bypass gatekeepers.</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-allow-you-to-bypass-gatekeepers/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-allow-you-to-bypass-gatekeepers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS NOT SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gatekeeper]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullshit.  You hear this a lot but don&#8217;t believe it.  It is the misguided extension of some legitimate ideas found in the “wisdom of crowds” and &#8220;wikinomics&#8221; crowd.  That the blogosphere is more “democratic” is a fantasy.  I know Democracy.  I live in a Democracy. The blogosphere is no Democracy.  Rather, it is a fiefdom [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit.  You hear this a lot but don&#8217;t believe it.  It is the misguided extension of some legitimate ideas found in the “wisdom of crowds” and &#8220;wikinomics&#8221; crowd.  That the blogosphere is more “democratic” is a fantasy.  I know Democracy.  I live in a Democracy. The blogosphere is no Democracy.  Rather, it is a fiefdom of warlords, chieftans, and medicine men (and women), each with their own cult band of followers.  Each with their own culture, language, and idiosyncratic power centers.  This is not serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-allow-you-to-bypass-gatekeepers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Efficient and cheap:  Social media campaigns are more cost effective.</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-are-more-cost-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-are-more-cost-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS NOT SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viral campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who sell this line are high on something.  Most are high on the outrageous fees they charge.   Here’s the traditional media / communications / PR formula — develop your message, train a spokesperson, go on a media tour.  How simple is that?  How cheap is that? Social media campaigns require more planning (because this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who sell this line are high on something.  Most are high on the outrageous fees they charge.   Here’s the traditional media / communications / PR formula — develop your message, train a spokesperson, go on a media tour.  How simple is that?  How cheap is that? Social media campaigns require more planning (because this stuff can backfire like nobody’s business — ask our friends at Edelman, MWW, and virtually every other company that has tried to pull off a viral campaign), more involvement of more people and more technical resources than most people have.  It is very powerful but it ain’t cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/social-media-campaigns-are-more-cost-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy measurement:  Now I&#8217;ll know what works</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-blog-and-social-media-campaigns-are-better-because-it-is-online-and-you-can-measure-it/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-blog-and-social-media-campaigns-are-better-because-it-is-online-and-you-can-measure-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS NOT SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sticky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More snake oil.  Dream on.  If you&#8217;re serious about the blogosphere you can&#8217;t be serious about this.  You can measure activity — clicks, views, entrances and exits. But it is still just as difficult &#8212; perhaps more so &#8211;to measure what is actually changing knowledge, attitude and behavior.  People talk about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More snake oil.  Dream on.  If you&#8217;re serious about the blogosphere you can&#8217;t be serious about this.  You can measure activity — clicks, views, entrances and exits. But it is still just as difficult &#8212; perhaps more so &#8211;to measure what is actually changing knowledge, attitude and behavior.  People talk about how many “views” some goofy video gets.  I’m thinking … so?  I’ve been doing this for 20 years.  It ain’t hard to get people’s attention.  Car wrecks will do that.  But getting something in front of them that actually gets them to buy your stuff (whether it is products or ideas) is a completely different story.  We can measure more stuff, but we are still having a devil of a time figuring out whether any of that stuff is doing us any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-blog-and-social-media-campaigns-are-better-because-it-is-online-and-you-can-measure-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key ingredient:  Can&#8217;t live without it.</title>
		<link>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-you-have-to-act-immediately-or-you%e2%80%99ll-be-blogosphere-road-kill/</link>
		<comments>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-you-have-to-act-immediately-or-you%e2%80%99ll-be-blogosphere-road-kill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjohnson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[THIS IS NOT SERIOUS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[second life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[warren buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t believe it.  Many companies do just fine and never touch the blogosphere.  I know because some of them are my clients.  There are those who claim that the new media train is leaving the station and if you don’t go home and buy a gazillion search terms, build a palace in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe it.  Many companies do just fine and never touch the blogosphere.  I know because some of them are my clients.  There are those who claim that the new media train is leaving the station and if you don’t go home and buy a gazillion search terms, build a palace in Second Life and juggle 14 blogs you’re going to be roadkill. I’ve heard that roadkill thing before. It was 1999 and it was (irrational) Internet exuberance and they all worked for companies that flamed out. Hmmm.<strong> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');">Warren Buffett</a> </strong>never swallowed the Internet hype. He seems to have done ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingtheblogosphereseriously.com/2007/12/18/that-you-have-to-act-immediately-or-you%e2%80%99ll-be-blogosphere-road-kill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
